Cost, Compliance & Risks

As St. Patrick’s Day approaches, many of us are on the lookout for four-leaf clovers, a pot of gold, or perhaps even a mischievous leprechaun guarding his treasure. But in the world of government contracting, the real tricksters aren’t wearing green coats and buckled shoes—and there is no gold at the end of the procurement rainbow. Instead, that pot is full of the recently announced tariffs. Effective March 4, 2025, the Trump administration imposed 25 percent tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports (exclusive of Canada energy imports, where there is a 10 percent tariff) and a 20 percent tariff on Chinese products. While economists, pundits, and the stock market will all have their say on the wisdom behind these actions, such prognostication is of little help to federal contractors who are forced to deal with the very real effects right now.

Continue Reading Tariffs, Leprechauns, and Contract Gold: Navigating the Hidden Costs of Trade Policies

As much we all love Rihanna, it’s a real shame how many contractors have called me in the last few days with issues that remind me of her well-known “Pay Me What You Owe Me” lyrics. They’re brought to mind because contractors are – on an increasing basis – being denied payment on properly invoiced sums. In some cases, contractors have even been expressly advised by agency officials that they will not be paid at all for the foreseeable future. “Don’t submit any future invoices until you hear from us” is becoming a shockingly common refrain. And yet, the work being invoiced was properly performed. There is no allegation of delayed or deficient performance. Indeed, the amounts due are undisputedly owing to the contractor. So what is going on?!?

Continue Reading Pay Me What You Owe Me, Don’t Act Like You Forgot!

Amid the chaos of the past few weeks—sweeping executive orders, relentless cost-cutting, and an air of uncertainty that lingers like smoke after a fire—federal contractors have been left reeling, straining to hear what comes next through the deafening noise. In this storm, predicting the future is as futile as fortune-telling. And yet beneath the shouts of change and upheaval, one truth remains, a whisper through the screams—some things, especially those that serve the government’s interests, are not going anywhere.

Continue Reading Whisper Through the Screams: DOJ Commits to False Claims Act Enforcement in 2025

On February 26, 2025, the White House issued another Executive Order (EO) that will have major implications for Federal government contractors across numerous industries and agencies. The new EO, entitled Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Cost Efficiency Initiative, requires every agency to work with that agency’s DOGE Team Lead (i.e., the leader of the DOGE Team at each agency, as defined in Executive Order 14158) to, among other things, conduct a review of covered contracts and grants, set up guidance for new contracts aimed at promoting efficiency and the Trump administration’s priorities, and build a system to track and justify payments made to contractors. What does that mean for you? Consider the below.

Continue Reading New EO Demands Agencies Conduct Review of All Covered Contracts and Grants, Terminate or Modify To Reduce Spending, and Set Up System To Track and Justify All Future Payments

Amid a flurry of executive orders starting his second administration, President Donald Trump issued an order entitled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (the “Order”) on January 21, 2025. The Order will have an immediate impact on federal contractors and subcontractors currently subject to the affirmative action obligations concerning women and minorities under now-revoked Executive Order 11246 dated September 24, 1965 (and the subsequent executive orders that refined these obligations). It also signals a significant change in the focus of federal enforcement of equal opportunity laws. The Order does NOT, however, change any of the substantive federal law regarding employment discrimination. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it remains illegal for employers to make employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Other federal and state statutes prohibit making employment decisions on various other bases, including age, disability, genetic make-up, etc.; none of these substantive laws have been changed. So what has changed?

Continue Reading DEI, Discrimination, Affirmative Action and More: How the Recent Executive Order Impacts Private Employers

Just how broad is the scope of the False Claims Act (FCA)? That is the basic question posed in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Heath, No. 23-1127. Put more directly, the case addresses whether reimbursement requests under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support program—better known as the E-Rate program—are actionable “claims” exposed to liability under the FCA. But when the US Supreme Court hears oral argument next month, the justices will grapple with broader questions with implications far beyond this case: (1) when does the government “provide” money in any transaction or program so that FCA liability attaches; (2) when is an independent government-sponsored enterprise (e.g., Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac) acting as an “agent” of the United States for FCA purposes; and (3) to what extent do those who deal with private entities established or chartered pursuant to federal law need to watch this case to determine their potential exposure under the FCA and its panoply of enforcement mechanisms?

Continue Reading Wisconsin Bell: Testing the Elasticity of False Claims Act’s Scope

Sequels are rarely better than the films that precede them, and yet, sometimes a story is just too compelling to be limited to just one film. At the tail end of a summer full of Hollywood sequels, the Department of Defense (DoD) released a long-gestating sequel of its own. On August 15, 2024, DoD published a Proposed Rule that would revise the DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 into DoD contracts in the near(ish) future. This follows a December 2023 Proposed Rule, discussed here, establishing the CMMC 2.0 requirements in broad strokes. In this latest Proposed Rule, DoD proposes several changes to the DFARS that would do the following:

Continue Reading CMMC and DFARS 252.204-7021—Is the Sequel Better than the Original?

Johnny, rosin up your bow and play your fiddle hard
’Cause Hell’s broke loose in Georgia and the Devil deals the cards
And if you win, you get this shiny fiddle made of gold
But if you lose the Devil gets your soul
~ The Charlie Daniels Band

Some might say there’s little difference between dealing with the devil and being a federal contractor. And for the unwary or unprepared, that may not be far off. Federal contracting comes with a litany of “fine print” that would make “Old Scratch” proud. However, as most savvy contractors recognize, it’s all hiding in plain sight, with the devil in the details. Take, for example, the cybersecurity requirements found in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) at 52.204-21 and the Department of Defense (DoD) FAR Supplement (DFARS) at 252.204-7012, -7019, and -7020. These requirements have been the topic of countless articles, trainings, webinars, whole conferences, etc., so it is surprising while simultaneously not surprising that they form the basis of a federal False Claims Act (FCA) claim the Department of Justice (DOJ) recently filed in its complaint in intervention.

Continue Reading DOJ Went Down to Georgia: Lessons Learned from Recent Cybersecurity Enforcement Actions

On August 1, 2024, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division introduced its Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program (Program), which, like a modern-day Western posse, aims to bring justice to the wild frontier of corporate America. The DOJ is enticing anyone willing to saddle up and provide information on corporate outlaws—i.e., those involved in corruption, financial crimes, foreign corruption, bribery, and/or healthcare fraud. In sum, the Program closes the gaps left by existing whistleblower programs and bolsters the DOJ’s efforts to combat corporate crime. For those who decide to ride with it, the DOJ is promising substantial financial rewards—up to 30 percent of the loot recovered from those outlaws—to insiders, whistleblowers, and relators who come forward with information leading to significant criminal or civil forfeiture actions. As the Program unfolds over its three-year pilot period, it will—or should—be closely watched by False Claims Act defense counsel, plaintiff’s counsel, corporate leaders, and potential whistleblowers alike. If successful, it could permanently expand whistleblower incentives and further embolden an already aggressive DOJ (as if more encouragement were needed), signaling a new frontier in corporate governance and accountability in the United States.

Continue Reading A New Frontier in Corporate Accountability: The DOJ’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program