Uncategorized

Subscribe to Uncategorized via RSS

The biggest danger may be misreading the order—and creating new exposure in the process.

On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued an executive order (EO) titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors.” Read at the headline level, the order can sound like another broad anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) pronouncement. Read as a procurement directive, however, it is something more concrete and more consequential: a command to federal agencies to begin inserting a mandatory clause into covered contracts and contract-like instruments, including subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts, within 30 days. That shift, from messaging to mechanics, is the real story.

Continue Reading Beyond the Headlines: The Real Contractor Risks in the New DEI Executive Order

Following a tumultuous start to fiscal year 2026, including a government shutdown that lasted 43 days, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2026 (NDAA 2026), Pub. L. 119-60, was passed by Congress and signed into law on December 18, 2025. NDAA 2026 is a critical legislative act, setting acquisition reforms and policies and authorizing appropriations and funding levels for the Department of Defense (DoD). With $900.6 billion in funding for the DoD, NDAA 2026 contains a plethora of acquisition reform provisions and critical updates impacting defense contractors. Title XVIII of NDAA 2026 significantly increased certain acquisition thresholds, including triggers for the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act (formerly the Truth in Negotiations Act) and Cost Accounting Standards application, which you can read about here. Additionally, NDAA 2026 increases the thresholds for noncompetitive acquisitions and when information technology requirements qualify as a major system.

Continue Reading FY2026 NDAA: Major Increases to Critical Acquisition Thresholds

The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) became law on December 18, 2025, enacting a tidal wave of the Trump administration’s priorities with respect to Department of Defense (DoD) procurement. One key priority reflected in the NDAA is reducing compliance burdens so that (i) established DoD contractors are incentivized to pursue awards and (ii) more companies opt in to being a DoD contractor to grow the industrial base. Importantly, Section 1804 and Section 1806 of the NDAA take action on this priority by raising the dollar thresholds for complex domains of government contracting: the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) and submission of certified cost or pricing data. While these changes are welcome developments, companies should be cognizant that a steady stream of compliance requirements remains even with these increased thresholds.

Continue Reading Swept Away: FY2026 NDAA Updates to CAS and Certified Cost or Pricing Data Thresholds

On December 18, 2025, the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (FY2026 NDAA) became law. True to each year’s NDAA being a sprawling piece of legislation, the FY2026 NDAA contains many priorities of the current Administration. Nestled among its myriad provisions, federal grant recipients should take note of Section 230, the “Prohibition on Modification of Indirect Cost Rates for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organization.” This section provides a speed bump for rapid changes to indirect cost rates for Department of Defense grantees and reflects congressional sympathy to grantee concerns, particularly those of institutes of higher education (IHEs).

Continue Reading College Prep: What Colleges with DoD Grants Should Do Now Under the FY2026 NDAA

Drumroll, please. On November 7, 2025, the Department of Defense (DoD) released three memoranda signaling changes to its approach to procurement and Foreign Military Sales/Direct Commercial Sales in the years to come: “Unifying the Department’s Arms Transfer and Security Cooperation Enterprise to Improve Efficiency and Enable Burden-Sharing”; “Reforming the Joint Requirements Process to Accelerate Fielding of Warfighting Capabilities”; and “Transforming the Defense Acquisition System into the Warfighting Acquisition System to Accelerate Fielding of Urgently Needed Capabilities to Our Warriors.” The latter memorandum appends the DoD’s Acquisition Transformation Strategy (the Strategy), which is aimed at dramatically reforming how the DoD’s acquisition system operates with an eye toward increasing the speed and flexibility of DoD procurements and the acquisition workforce. This document begins the march toward sunsetting the existing Defense Acquisition System in favor of what is envisioned to be a more rapid and effective system designed to provide the DoD with the capabilities it needs to meet its mission requirements.

Continue Reading The Drumbeat of Progress: DOD’s Acquisition Transformation Strategy

The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) of the General Services Administration (GSA) revealed on October 17, 2025, that it will issue a Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Solicitation 47QSMD20R0001 “refresh” sometime in November 2025. While GSA allowed the contracting community 10 business days to submit comments—until October 31, 2025—as MAS contract holders know, GSA issues refreshes from time to time so that changes are made uniformly in recognition of shifts in policy, regulations, or statutes. Administering MAS contracts in this way allows GSA to curate terms in a consistent manner for contractual vehicles at all stages of performance, as contractors perform orders at different times.

Continue Reading Total GSA Schedule Makeover: Incoming Mass Mod Not Merely a Refresh

This year, The Rocky Horror Picture Show celebrates the 50th anniversary of its release. While that cult classic film has stood the test of time, another relic of the 1970s, the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), is showing its age. When CAS was initially promulgated, Congress determined that the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were not enough to satisfy the government’s requirements for evaluating contract costing and pricing. However, in the decades since, GAAP has evolved, and there are now areas of overlap that have arisen since CAS was first promulgated. Recognizing this overlap, the government has set in motion a review to determine which parts of CAS could be addressed by GAAP, which is the commercial standard regularly used by companies. If there were accounting areas where GAAP could stand in place of CAS, the government wants to reduce the overall burden in the procurement process by allowing contractors to more heavily rely on GAAP, which they are already using to report on their daily business activities.

Continue Reading CAS Madness Takes Its Toll: The Detailed Work of Conforming CAS to GAAP

As we have previously covered in this blog, as a result of President Trump’s executive order, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is undergoing an extensive and unprecedented rewrite. While many of us were enjoying the relaxation of summer days (drifting away to summer nights), the Trump administration has been busy issuing rolling updates to the FAR, which are poised to dramatically reshape the federal acquisition landscape. On August 14, 2025, the FAR Council told us more (told us more) by issuing draft revisions to FAR Parts 4, 8, 12, and 40. The revisions to FAR Part 12 are particularly noteworthy, as they go to the heart of the executive order’s policy statement that the federal procurement system should be “agile, effective, and efficient” and that “undue barriers” should be removed from federal procurement.

Continue Reading Summer Sun, Something’s Begun, But (Oh, Oh) Those FAR Part 12 Rewrites

July’s “Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan,” released by the White House, contains helpful recommendations for the energy sector as the use of AI becomes more prevalent and, with it, the need for more energy. The plan recommends the use of an existing consultation and coordination process for expediting the federal permitting and review of large infrastructure projects to cover all eligible data center and data center energy projects. It also recommends optimizing existing grid resources, prioritizing the interconnection of reliable power sources, ensuring sufficient generation exists to support data centers, and embracing new technology and sources of energy.

Continue Reading Power Up: What the AI Action Plan Means for the Energy Sector

“Ding ding.” – Apollo Creed,
Rocky III

September 30. All (most?) federal years end the same way, at least on paper—like a prizefight, with the clock ticking down; an agitated, uncertain crowd; a lot of money on the table; and a ref capable of stopping the match at any moment. This year will be at once both no different and a completely different beast. With ever-recent uncertainty surrounding appropriations, continuing-resolution (CR) risk, evolving Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) language, the tightening screws of cyber attestations, industry supply-chain and acquisition changes, and grant closeouts that always take longer than you’d think, September is not a month for contractor improvisation. It’s a month when a dedicated corner team, a game plan, and crisp execution all are paramount.

Continue Reading And in This Corner … the Sweet Science of Federal Contracting’s Year-End