Uncategorized

Subscribe to Uncategorized via RSS

The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) of the General Services Administration (GSA) revealed on October 17, 2025, that it will issue a Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Solicitation 47QSMD20R0001 “refresh” sometime in November 2025. While GSA allowed the contracting community 10 business days to submit comments—until October 31, 2025—as MAS contract holders know, GSA issues refreshes from time to time so that changes are made uniformly in recognition of shifts in policy, regulations, or statutes. Administering MAS contracts in this way allows GSA to curate terms in a consistent manner for contractual vehicles at all stages of performance, as contractors perform orders at different times.Continue Reading Total GSA Schedule Makeover: Incoming Mass Mod Not Merely a Refresh

New rules for grants requiring a convenience termination
And limiting costs for facilities and administration
And if you want these kind of dreams, it’s Contractification[1]

In its continuous drive to alter business as usual, the federal government has made many changes this year to the way it manages financial assistance (grants and cooperative agreements). Executive Order 14332, “Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking” (the EO), issued on August 7, 2025, is the latest expression of this new effort and evidences the government’s intent to exert more control over grants and cooperative agreements. As summarized below, the changes generally fall within the inherently flexible framework the government has over such awards, but taken as a whole—and given the framing and rhetoric of the EO—the government’s approach, whether intentional or not, resembles “contractification,” that is, to remake the administration of grants and cooperative agreements to be more like procurement contracts.Continue Reading Viva ‘Contractification’: New Executive Order Promises Changes to Grant Oversight

McCarter’s Government Contracts team is grateful to its clients for once again honoring it with a Band 1 Nationwide ranking by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business. It appreciates the recognition that “the lawyers are exceptionally experienced and on top of all the changes in government contracts,” and that “their responsiveness and attention …

23andMe, a pioneer in the DNA testing kit industry, announced that it has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and recently asked to select an independent customer data representative regarding any sale of user data. Its bankruptcy raises issues about data privacy and what companies must do to protect that data for the benefit of their customers and to protect themselves from litigation or violations of US and international privacy laws.Continue Reading Follow the Breadcrumbs: Where Does Consumer Data Go as 23andMe Goes Bankrupt?

WASHINGTON (March 25, 2025) – McCarter & English today announced that Erin Prest, former FBI Privacy & Civil Liberties Officer and Deputy General Counsel has joined the firm’s cybersecurity team as a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC office. Prest joins following an exemplary 18-year career at the FBI, where she oversaw the agency’s data security and privacy protection practices, its responses to breaches and cybersecurity events impacting FBI information, and provided guidance to FBI executives to protect the civil liberties of individuals under investigation. As Deputy General Counsel, she also oversaw the legal guidance related to criminal investigative activities, crisis response, procurement, criminal history information, and DNA matters among others.Continue Reading McCarter & English Welcomes Erin Prest Former Privacy & Civil Liberties Officer and Deputy General Counsel of FBI to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice

Just how broad is the scope of the False Claims Act (FCA)? That is the basic question posed in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Heath, No. 23-1127. Put more directly, the case addresses whether reimbursement requests under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support program—better known as the E-Rate program—are actionable “claims” exposed to liability under the FCA. But when the US Supreme Court hears oral argument next month, the justices will grapple with broader questions with implications far beyond this case: (1) when does the government “provide” money in any transaction or program so that FCA liability attaches; (2) when is an independent government-sponsored enterprise (e.g., Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac) acting as an “agent” of the United States for FCA purposes; and (3) to what extent do those who deal with private entities established or chartered pursuant to federal law need to watch this case to determine their potential exposure under the FCA and its panoply of enforcement mechanisms?Continue Reading Wisconsin Bell: Testing the Elasticity of False Claims Act’s Scope

On April 29, 2024, the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) released guidance to federal contractors regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in their employment practices. See https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ofccp/ai/ai-eeo-guide. The guidance reminds federal contractors of their existing legal obligations, the potentially harmful effects of AI on employment decisions if used improperly, and best practices. Arriving early, the guidance puts contractors on notice of their responsibilities when using AI in their employment decisions.Continue Reading Department of Labor Issues New Guidance on the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Employment Decision-Making

In Percipient.ai v. United States, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may have triggered a legal “Big Bang” moment in government procurement law. The case centered on whether the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act’s (FASA) “task order bar” could suppress claims alleging violations of 10 U.S.C. § 3453, which mandates a preference for commercial products. The Panel’s interpretation of the Tucker Act’s definition of “interested party” expanded the universe of standing, allowing prospective subcontractors to exert gravitational influence in legal challenges regardless of their role as indirect offerors. At the risk of offending real physicists, from a legal perspective, the Percipient.ai v. United States decision looks to expand a universe of legal scrutiny. Like the cosmic forces that shape galaxies, the Percipient.ai decision may shape the parameters of government contracting jurisdiction and procedural fairness in the procurement process.Continue Reading Big Bang?: The Federal Circuit, Percipient.ai, and Expanding Jurisdiction

McCarter’s Government Contracts team is grateful to its clients for once again honoring it with a Band 1 Nationwide ranking by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business. It appreciates the recognition that “McCarter & English, LLP is lauded for its ability to provide guidance on a broad array of issues including transactions, regulatory …

Cyber incidents involving critical infrastructure pose a serious risk to the US. In March 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Security Advisor warned state governors about potential attacks on drinking water and wastewater facilities by specific Iran- and China-aligned hackers. The following month (on April 4, 2024), in an attempt to prepare for such attacks and otherwise improve the federal government’s ability to collect and analyze data related to cyber incidents on critical infrastructure, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a proposed rule to implement cyber incident reporting requirements under the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA). Enacted in an omnibus appropriation, CIRCIA directed CISA to issue rulemaking requiring the reporting of cyber incidents or the payment of ransoms in response to cyberattacks affecting critical infrastructure.  Continue Reading CISA’s CIRCIA Proposed Rule: Another Player Enters the Reporting Regime